<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talking Through My Hat &#187; Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billprintbroker.com/tag/post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com</link>
	<description>Printing, Publishing, and Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:45:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wanna Know Who Caused Printers So Much Hurt?</title>
		<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2010/04/wanna-know-who-caused-printers-so-much-hurt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2010/04/wanna-know-who-caused-printers-so-much-hurt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banks & Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Frustrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxpayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blindly Following]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogeyman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downsizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elected officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDR era]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sacs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPMorgan Chase & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loopholes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nest Egg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ploy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing News Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-size Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roosevelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.E.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talking Throug My Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells Fargo & Co.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=2675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone knows that the printing business is changing, but it took Wall Street in collusion with our government to make it catastrophic. We could have transitioned into the new market realities much more smoothly if the economy hadn't gone to hell in a hand basket. How did it happen?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><h5><span style="color: #808080;">by Bill Ruesch</span></h5>
<h2><span style="color: #000033;"><em><strong>READ ON</strong></em></span></h2>
<p><span style="color: #000033;"><em>The tag line to <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Talking Through My Hat</span> is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Printing, Publishing, and Observations.</span> This particular post falls more in the category of Observations&#8211;or does it? We all know that the printing industry is changing, but did the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>changes </strong></span>have to be so<span style="color: #330066;"> <strong>catastrophic</strong></span>? <a href="http://www.printingnews.com/publication/index.jsp?pubId=3" title="Printing News Magazine" >Printing News Magazine</a> recently posted an article on downsizing that contained these words in the first paragraph, <span style="color: #330066;">&#8220;</span></em></span><em><span style="color: #000033;"><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">The latest financial crisis seems to have affected our industry like no  previous recession. Record numbers of printers have closed  or consolidated. Staff, salary and work hour reductions have become  common themes.&#8221;</span> </span>To read more see, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.linkedin.com/news?viewArticle=&amp;articleID=125286752&amp;gid=1838649&amp;articleURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.printingnews.com%2Fprint%2FPrinting-News%2FImplementing-a-Right-sizing-Plan%2F3%2412323&amp;urlhash=is_D&amp;trk=news_discuss" title="Printing News--Implementing a Right-Size Plan"  target="_blank">Implementing a Right-size Plan</a>. It is a good article.</span></em></p>
<h2><em><span style="color: #000033;">WILL THE REAL BOGEYMAN PLEASE STAND UP?<br />
</span></em></h2>
<p><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Goldman Sachs</strong></span> </span>is in trouble with the <strong><span style="color: #330066;">S.E.C.</span><em><span style="color: #4c004c;"> </span></em></strong>It&#8217;s all over the news. Whether they are guilty of the charges against them I don&#8217;t really know, but I&#8217;m concerned that they are being singled out to<span style="color: #330066;"><strong> take one for the team</strong></span>. You see, <span style="color: #4c004c;"><span style="color: #330066;"><strong>diversion</strong></span><em><strong> </strong></em></span>is a common <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>ploy</strong></span> used by government to<strong><span style="color: #330066;"> pacify the</span><span style="color: #4c004c;"><span style="color: #330066;"> populace</span>.</span></strong> If they can hold up one bad apple and convince us that the problem will be solved by the censure, restriction, or removal of the perceived enemy all will be made right. Our<strong><span style="color: #4c004c;"> <span style="color: #330066;">anger</span></span><span style="color: #330066;"> will dissipate </span></strong>and we the people will continue <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>blindly following and believing</strong></span> our leaders who are, after all, just sincerely protecting our interests.</p>
<h2><em><span style="color: #000033;"><strong>DON&#8217;T BELIEVE IT!</strong></span></em></h2>
<p>The<span style="color: #330099;"><strong> <span style="color: #330066;">anger of the American people</span></strong></span> that arose from the financial collapse and bailout is <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>justified</strong></span>. If they try to convince us that it was just because <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Goldman Sachs went renegade</strong></span>&#8211;don&#8217;t believe it.<span style="color: #330099;"><strong> <span style="color: #330066;">The problem is much bigger </span></strong></span>than one company. The problem was created by the <strong><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">congress in collusion</span> </span></strong>with the financial industry.</p>
<p>I was one who was once convinced that the <strong>Free Market</strong> would make everything right. Doesn’t the idea of a<strong><span style="color: #330099;"> <span style="color: #330066;">free market</span> </span></strong>make sense? After all, free people make choices based on what they want and how much they are willing to pay. Industries either find ways to provide the goods and services desired by the consumers or they go out of business. That&#8217;s <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>free enterprise</strong></span>, and who could possibly be against free enterprise?</p>
<h2><em><span style="color: #000033;"><strong>WRONG!</strong></span></em></h2>
<p>For most of my life I&#8217;ve been wrapped up in a warm pink bubble secure in the belief that the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Constitution guides</strong></span> our government and <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>protects our interests</strong>-</span>-wrong! Our elected officials have become <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>masters of illusion</strong>.</span> They pledge their hearts, minds, and souls to serving the people and upholding the Constitution and then they and their lobbyist buddies huddle in secret places to find, or <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>create loopholes</strong></span>.</p>
<p>I was convinced that <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>FDR was a socialist</strong> </span>and that his policies were the<strong><span style="color: #330066;"> real </span><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">threat</span> </span></strong>to the American way of life, but Roosevelt put<span style="color: #330066;"><strong> restrictions on the banks</strong></span> that kept them from pulling the shenanigans that led to this deepest <strong><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">recession</span> </span></strong>since the<strong><span style="color: #330099;"> <span style="color: #330066;">Great Depression</span></span></strong> and nearly toppled the financial systems of the entire world.</p>
<h2><em><span style="color: #000033;"><strong>WHAT HAPPENED?</strong></span></em></h2>
<p><span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Deregulation</strong></span> is what happened. Deregulation was proposed by<span style="color: #330099;"><strong> <span style="color: #330066;">Ronald Reagan</span></strong></span> during his administration. Again, <strong><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">it seemed like a good idea</span> </span></strong>at the time. Then came the Savings and Loan collapses. We slowed deregulation for a time, but over the years culminating with <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Bill Clinton</strong></span>, one-by-one all of the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>FDR restrictions </strong></span>were removed. Did deregulation make life better for consumers? At first it did&#8211;maybe. Then chaos reigned. <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Without rules</strong></span> the financial industry went wild. They started offering mortgage loans to people who didn&#8217;t have to prove they had the ability to repay those loans. Who thought <em>that </em>was a good idea?</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">Goldman Sacs executives</span> </span></strong>were, and apparently still are, at the top of the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>gravy chain</strong></span>. By some miracle they finally got caught by the<strong><span style="color: #330066;"> S.E.C</span></strong>. Like the SEC didn&#8217;t know what they were up to long before this&#8211;right? They along with other <strong><span style="color: #330066;">bazillion dollar a year execs</span><span style="color: #330099;"> </span></strong>plotted to sell<strong><span style="color: #330066;"> derivatives</span></strong> and created other financial vehicles to muddy the waters and  <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>obscure the big secret </strong></span>that the nest egg had already been <strong><span style="color: #330066;">sucked dry. </span></strong><span style="color: #000000;"> In reality there wasn&#8217;t a nest egg at all! A good-faith contract  knowingly offered to a party that does not have the means </span>to meet the  terms of the agreement is<span style="color: #330066;"> <strong>not an asset</strong></span>&#8211;duh.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #000033;"><em><strong>GOVERNMENT TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER</strong></em></span></h2>
<p>The <strong><span style="color: #330066;">banking interests</span></strong> have been <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>funding lobbying</strong></span> like they never have before. The <a rel="nofollow" href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/feb/16/business/la-fi-bank-lobbying16-2010feb16" title="LA Times --Bank Lobbying"  target="_blank">LA Times</a> had this to say about lobbying expense,&#8221;<span style="color: #000033;"><em>The biggest spender was <strong><span style="color: #330066;">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</span></strong>, whose lobbying  budget <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>rose 12%</strong></span> to $6.2 million, enough for the firm to have <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>more than  30 lobbyists</strong> </span>working for it. Among <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>other banks</strong></span>, spending on lobbying  rose <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>27% at Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</strong></span> and<span style="color: #330066;"> <strong>16% at Morgan Stanley.</strong></span></em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000033;"><em>&#8220;I  have never seen such a<span style="color: #330099;"><strong> <span style="color: #330066;">scrum of bank lobbyists</span></strong></span><span style="color: #330066;"> </span>as I have in the last  year &#8212; and I&#8217;ve worked on quite a few bank issues over the years,&#8221; said  Ed Mierzwinski, a lobbyist for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group,  a coalition of state consumer organizations. It seems like everybody  is out of work except for bank lobbyists.&#8221;</em></span></p>
<h2><span style="color: #000033;"><em><strong>SURPRISE, SURPRISE!</strong></em></span></h2>
<p>In retrospect, is it any wonder that this foolish behavior would lead to<strong><span style="color: #330099;"> collapse</span></strong>? We were told two years before it happened that there was a housing bubble, but even our personal Realtor was convinced that prices were going to continue to escalate. For awhile he seemed to be right. The home we bought for just over 300 thousand, climbed to 500 thousand+ over the next two years. Lucky for us we bought low and with a mortgage payment we could afford, so we haven&#8217;t been in danger of foreclosure.  What is our house worth now? Closer to what we paid for it originally. At least we aren&#8217;t upside down. Thank goodness for that.</p>
<p>We have survived, so far, the <strong><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">housing bubble</span>.</span></strong> What we are fighting everyday, however, is the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>aftershocks of the recession</strong></span>. All the banks are<span style="color: #330066;"> <strong>raising interest rates</strong></span> so <em>they </em>can recover, at our expense, the losses sustained from <em>their </em>bad decisions. People have had to cut back on purchases they would have normally made. Because of belt tightening by consumers, business saw decreases in sales and governments local, state, and federal saw resulting decreases in taxes so governments have been trying to recoup their losses by raising rates, fees, and taxes where ever they can.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #000033;"><em><strong>WHEN WE CAN LEAST AFFORD IT</strong></em></span></h2>
<p>When we can least afford it, the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>poor </strong></span><span style="color: #330099;"><strong><span style="color: #330066;">taxpayer/consumer</span> </strong></span>is being <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>squeezed for every dime</strong></span>. Does <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Goldman Sacs </strong></span>deserve to be on the <strong><span style="color: #330066;">chopping block</span></strong>? I&#8217;m pretty sure that they do, but they aren&#8217;t the only ones. The system needs a huge overhaul and needs it now starting with reintroducing all of the FDR era banking restrictions.</p>
<p>For more of my thoughts go to: <a href="http://wp.me/pqeFo-qV%20"  target="_new">http://wp.me/pqeFo-qV</a> and <a href="http://wp.me/pqeFo-v5"  target="_new">http://wp.me/pqeFo-v5</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.billprintbroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/png-e1264380684958." ><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2293" title="Bills Hat" src="http://www.billprintbroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/png-e1264380684958." alt="" width="40" height="25" /></a><form method="post" action=""><input type="hidden" name="ip" value="38.107.179.223" /><p><label for="s2email">Your email:</label><br /><input type="text" name="email" id="s2email" value="Enter email address..." size="20" onfocus="if (this.value == 'Enter email address...') {this.value = '';}" onblur="if (this.value == '') {this.value = 'Enter email address...';}" /></p><p><input type="submit" name="subscribe" value="Subscribe" />&nbsp;<input type="submit" name="unsubscribe" value="Unsubscribe" /></p></form>

<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2010/04/wanna-know-who-caused-printers-so-much-hurt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Printers, does Print Broker &#8220;Prejudice&#8221; Harm You?</title>
		<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2010/02/printers-is-print-broker-prejudice-harming-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2010/02/printers-is-print-broker-prejudice-harming-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Frustrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print Brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commissioned Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invisible Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marginal Reps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paycheck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print Rep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reduce Friction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Successful]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweet Spot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Understanding Gap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=2448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Printing company owners, their sales representatives, and print brokers all share one trait -- the willingness to take risks. Who has more to lose if they engage in questionable business dealings? Answer that question honestly and you'll know where to place trust.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><p>I&#8217;ve been waiting a little longer than usual to make this post. My last post <em>the top 5 reasons print brokers p.o. printers</em> is still drawing a good response and I didn&#8217;t want to lose any readers before proceeding, either that, or I just didn&#8217;t get around to it yet. Both excuses are probably true to some extent.</p>
<p>My promise at the end of the last post was that I would toss out some ideas to reduce friction between Printing Brokers and Printers so that both could benefit. That particular promise will have to wait until the next post as I continue to explore the understanding gap that exists in commercial printing sales.</p>
<p>The following thoughts are mine alone. I would really hope that readers would go to the bottom of the post, past the hat logo, tags, categories, and click on <em>comments</em>. This is where you can leave your opinions. I do have to approve which opinions are accepted, but I promise I only delete those who appear to be spam, or who may incite a law suit. Other than that, you can disagree with me all the live-long day and I&#8217;ll let it go through.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve learned that my vantage point is rarely the same as another&#8217;s. Just because someone doesn&#8217;t see things my way,  doesn&#8217;t necessarily make them wrong. I like to say, &#8220;I could be wrong about that, I&#8217;ve been wrong before, and I&#8217;ll probably be wrong again.&#8221; The world might be a better place if we all let go of the idea that we have to be right, or I could be wrong about that too. See how it works?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to be addressing printers primarily, because in my experience it is the printers, who more than print brokers, cut off their noses to spite their faces. Again, please feel free to disagree.</p>
<p>In a conversation with a print rep the other day, we agreed that the negativity thrown at print brokers is  often undeserved. Instead printers should look toward their hired sales representatives. A print broker is more vulnerable, and has to walk a tighter line, in other words a broker has much more too risk. Involving themselves in transactions that are shaky can ruin more  than just a certain project.  The name of my company, for example, is Bill Ruesch Print Broker, LLC. If I screw up, I tarnish my name, my company name, and risk  my entire career. A printer&#8217;s sales rep on the other hand can botch something big-time and maybe get fired, but they can, and most always do, migrate to another printer where they can start over.</p>
<p>I read a survey a long time ago that concluded that the mindsets of a successful entrepreneur, a salesman, and a criminal were very similar. To be good at any of those three paths there had to be a willingness to accept a great deal of risk. It seems that the riskier the better. Printing company owners, sales representatives, and print brokers all have risk in common, but it is the effect on careers that makes the critical difference.</p>
<p>For commissioned sales people have immediate needs. You can&#8217;t feed the family or pay the mortgage if you don&#8217;t earn a paycheck. Therefore, they are often tempted to ram a square peg into the round hole. I don&#8217;t care how big the printer is, no company can efficiently serve the needs of every customer. The printer needs work, the sales rep needs a commission, and the customer, unfortunately, sometimes comes up short. <em>And don&#8217;t say it never happens at your company because it does. See my previous post about <a href="http://wp.me/pqeFo-be" title="Witholding Information From Customer" >withholding information</a> from a customer to the benefit of the printer.<br />
</em></p>
<p>This may sound like I&#8217;m being critical of company sales reps &#8212; I&#8217;m not &#8212; I&#8217;m only being critical of the marginal ones. To tell the truth I have a great deal of admiration for those who work for one company. I&#8217;ve been there, done that, myself. I often wondered why there were few older folks working in sales. One reason is that it is nearly impossible to please management. Either you are bringing in too much work, or not enough, and the line for the <em>exact </em>perfect amount moves daily. The stress is wearing.</p>
<p>I can tell you that as a broker I don&#8217;t miss the constant harangue, not at all.</p>
<p>Print brokers make their living at bringing print jobs to printers able to do the job. They work very hard at finding a good fit. Theoretically a print broker will only bring in jobs that hit the printer&#8217;s sweet spot. Sweet spot jobs are those that the printer is best equipped to do.</p>
<p>My point is that brokers are more likely to bring work through the doors that is a better fit, and because it is, it usually runs smoother with fewer complications. Doesn&#8217;t that have real intrinsic value? It is one of the many invisible benefits brokers bring to the table that are overlooked by printers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.billprintbroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/png-e1264380684958." ><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2293" title="png" src="http://www.billprintbroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/png-e1264380684958." alt="" width="40" height="25" /></a><form method="post" action=""><input type="hidden" name="ip" value="38.107.179.223" /><p><label for="s2email">Your email:</label><br /><input type="text" name="email" id="s2email" value="Enter email address..." size="20" onfocus="if (this.value == 'Enter email address...') {this.value = '';}" onblur="if (this.value == '') {this.value = 'Enter email address...';}" /></p><p><input type="submit" name="subscribe" value="Subscribe" />&nbsp;<input type="submit" name="unsubscribe" value="Unsubscribe" /></p></form>

<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2010/02/printers-is-print-broker-prejudice-harming-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Sure Ways to Pull Our Fat Out of the Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/08/10-ways-to-pull-our-fat-out-of-the-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/08/10-ways-to-pull-our-fat-out-of-the-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxpayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bonus Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureaucrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buystanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Champion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Honchos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enemy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impossible Odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Accountabilty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reserves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salary Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seabiscuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tycoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vilains]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=1669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You see, my last post More Dangerous to us than Terrorists generated a lot of comments, more than my usual posts. That's good! What's bad is the sense that we are giving up. Are we really all that fatalistic? Do we carry the thought that there is nothing we can do about it so why try?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><p>I didn&#8217;t want this post to be another rant. I was going to concentrate on the printing or publishing business and leave my tirades behind. That&#8217;s what I intended to do, but I can&#8217;t let it go just yet. You see, my last post <em>More Dangerous to us than Terrorists</em> generated a lot of comments, more than my usual posts. That&#8217;s good! What&#8217;s bad is the sense I&#8217;m getting that we are giving up. Are we really all that fatalistic? Do we carry the thought that there is nothing we can do about it so why try?  I&#8217;m concerned that we don&#8217;t have a clear enemy, that we think it is beyond our control anyway, and somehow small businesses and the general public are at fault.</p>
<p>One commenter named Vic wrote, &#8220;Wait a minute! Casting corporate honchos as villains sure feels good, and has a degree of merit, but <span style="color: #000080;">we all share responsibility in making this mess</span>. We were the ones who took out mortgage after mortgage, partying with the accrued equity of our homes. We were the ones who never [gave] a thought to the non-logic of an endlessly expanding economy. We were, and are, the shareholders in the huge corporations you criticize. I agree with much of what you say, but we were not helpless bystanders victimized by ruthless tycoons.&#8221;</p>
<p>To be fair Vic suggested some things we can do, like attending stockholders meetings, boycotting products, and living a lifestyle that supports our values. Okay Vic that is well and good, but isn&#8217;t blaming the little guy  like blaming a baby who is given a loaded gun to play with? And before you get too offended with the baby analogy seriously think about the financial complexity of getting a loan, and how many people really know what they are getting themselves into? If they understood ARM&#8217;s they would be a minuscule mortgage devise instead of a popular way to qualify buyers for more than they can afford&#8211;maybe buying a house that they got talked into by a slick Realtor. Think about it.</p>
<p>Another reader, Karl wrote, &#8220;A business that has not got the resources to weather a downturn like we are experiencing is probably not that healthy a business. <span style="color: #000080;">Did the owners put sufficient funding aside, focus on paying of debt and providing a buffer during good times?</span>&#8230;The priority of the business owner is the health of their business in good and bad times. Focus first on the business, and when it has plenty of reserves so it can keep marketing in difficult times, and is debt free, then the owner can ease off and get a few perks.</p>
<p>Yes, <span style="color: #000080;">the large corporates are really, really bad, but are the smaller businesses any different?</span> I say not. It’s just on a smaller scale.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think of the Billy Joel song that goes, &#8220;We didn&#8217;t start the fire.&#8221; I believe that we all play by the rules the best we can. Small business owners are just people trying their best to get by. They care about their companies and they care about its employees.  Just ask an owner what the most difficult job is and they will tell you, &#8220;Firing someone.&#8221; The small business person is up close and personal with their employees. They don&#8217;t devastate thousands of families with just a computer stroke, that&#8217;s the exclusive area of the tycoons.</p>
<p>In the movie <em>Seabiscuit </em> promoted the premise that this horse with heart helped shake the country out of the depression by providing a symbol. They could see this champion win race after race against impossible odds.</p>
<p>I am hoping that our symbol rises soon, but in the event that it doesn&#8217;t, I pray that the people will get some backbone and change things, like:</p>
<ul>
<li>Demand public accountability of public corporations.</li>
<li>Replace the <em><strong>entire</strong> </em>congress and executive branch if they don&#8217;t permanently ban lobbyists.</li>
<li>Rebuild the business infrastructure by encouraging American manufacturing.</li>
<li>Severely tax companies who send jobs out of the country. Make certain the tax costs are equal to the money saved by hiring cheap foreign workers.</li>
<li>If a shot in the arm is needed to jump start the economy, make sure it gets into the hands of the people and it encourages them to buy American made products.</li>
<li>Make sure that if any taxpayer money is used to bailout any company, in any way, that bonus and salary reviews become mandatory for all executives. No exceptions and no bonus money will ever be paid unless tied to productivity and the profitability of the company.</li>
<li>Punish and maybe jail politicians and bureaucrats found accepting any money, favors, or gifts from anyone seeking to influence them</li>
<li>Require single-payer health care. Any proposed solution to our health care woes that either force the small businesses to pay for it, or allow insurance companies to administer it will fail. We have to stop rewarding executives for denying claims. It is a sick system that turns away people in pain because they don&#8217;t have a magic card to gain entrance into the halls of  healing. We can&#8217;t afford the failure.</li>
<li>Pull back the military. Make it against the law to invade a sovereign country without providing evidence of a direct American threat. Why should we be the guardians of the word and spend taxpayer means to do it? Other countries don&#8217;t feel the need to do that&#8211;why should we?</li>
<li>Pay down the national debt. The thought that China and the Mid-East hold a sword to our necks is very disturbing.</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that these ten items will never come to fruition. See, I&#8217;m being fatalistic too, but it is something to think about. I love this country and am deeply concerned that if we don&#8217;t act in harmony and take the power away from those who abuse it, it will be taken from us.</p>
<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/08/10-ways-to-pull-our-fat-out-of-the-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

