<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talking Through My Hat &#187; ink dots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billprintbroker.com/tag/ink-dots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com</link>
	<description>Printing, Publishing, and Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:45:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Speak Printer?</title>
		<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/04/do-you-speak-printer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/04/do-you-speak-printer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Four Color Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CYMK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Proofs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elliptical Dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Res Proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ink dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Res Proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moire`]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxygen Saturation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screen Angles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Square Dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stochastic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subdural Hemotoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tibia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every industry has its own language. Attorneys use words like torts, writs, and injunctions. Doctors say subdural hemotoma, tibia, and oxygen saturation. The printing business has its own words to. To improve your odds in getting better printing it is helpful to communicate in printer speak.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><p>Every industry has its own language. If you are an attorney you use words like torts, writs, and injunctions. If you are a medical practitioner you use words like subdural hemotoma, tibia, and oxygen saturation. To the initiated these words are perfectly clear and immediately understandable. To the layperson, they can be intimidating and frustrating.</p>
<p>The printing business is full of its own words too. I wouldn&#8217;t expect a reader of this blog to get completely up-to-speed on printer talk by reading this, but I&#8217;m going to list some printing terms and attempt to describe them in such a way that you will be a little more comfortable with them.</p>
<p>In a previous blog <u>Printing Dots and CYMK</u> <a href="http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=336"  mce_href="http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=336">http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=336</a> I discussed four color process printing. Here are some words associated with color printing that you will hear spoken:</p>
<ul>
<li><u><b>Dots</b></u> Printing is done with dots.&nbsp; Not all printing dots are round, some are elliptical and others square (Stochastic).This one is easy to demonstrate.. If you look at any printed piece&nbsp; under magnification you&#8217;ll see the dots. People&#8217;s faces are very interesting because all the colors of dots are there.</li>
<li><u><b>Screen</b></u> A screen is a pattern of dots. Each color is angled differently to avoid some unintended Moire` patterns, which could show as wavy lines or blobs.</li>
<li><u><b>Registration</b></u> When the colored dots are aligned perfectly on the printed sheet they are <i>in register</i>. If they are off they are called <i>out of register.</i> The easiest way to see if printing is in register is with magnification, or if your short range vision is very good, or the registration is horribly off, you&#8217;ll see blurry edges. Usually this can be corrected on press by moving the printing plates into better alignment.</li>
<li><u><b>Ghosting</b></u> This term is more difficult to explain. Once you see it you&#8217;ll understand. You&#8217;ll recognize it most often when solid color borders are used on a page. Imagine a picture frame. It has four sides and an empty place where the picture goes. The frame is like a printed border. On the sides the border is continuous but in the middle there is for all intents and purposes nothing. When the paper passes through the press there is an ink buildup, when it comes around again the ink buildup has to go somewhere.&nbsp; Your printed image will show a distinct color variation from one side of the ghost line to the other.</li>
<li><u><b>Digital Proof</b></u> Most printers use digital proofs for color printing. These proofs come from the computer and are intended to be a close approximation of what you should see on press. As of this writing there is not a proofing system that will exactly replicate the image you are printing.&nbsp; Close is all we can do.</li>
<li><b><u>High Res Proof</u></b><u><b> and Low Res Proofs:</b></u><b><i> </i></b>Many printers will produce two proofs for your color job. The high res proof is more expensive to make, but is more color accurate. Low res proofs are excellent for booklets and any folded piece, and cost less. It is always a good idea to see a folded example of your job, otherwise it could be backed up wrong (upside-down) or have page numbers out of sequence.</li>
<li><u><b>Press Check:</b></u> I&#8217;ve discussed press checks in previous blogs such as: &nbsp;<a href="http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=709"  mce_href="http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=709"> http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=709</a>. If the printer doesn&#8217;t offer a press check and the piece is critical, be sure to request one yourself. It is the last opportunity for you to check it and gives you the chance to meet those who are producing it. I firmly believe that if they associate a face with a name you&#8217;ll generally get better work. It&#8217;s best not to be invisible. Plus with each press check you will learn something new.</li>
</ul>
<p>This list is in no way comprehensive, but if you can these seven terms and use them correctly you will get more respect from the printer. They will feel like they are dealing with someone who has some understanding of what they do. I&#8217;ll drop in other terms on future blogs, so you can keep learning.</p>
<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/04/do-you-speak-printer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Printing on Black Paper</title>
		<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/03/printing-on-black-paper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/03/printing-on-black-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Four Color Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offset Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paper Finishes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black-on-Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blind Emboss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CYMK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Bump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foil Die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foil Emboss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foil Stamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphic designers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy Metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ink dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metallic Inks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One-level Die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opaque Inks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper merchant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paper Mill Respresentative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reverse Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sculptured Die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Splotchy Solids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spot UV Coating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaky Solids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Textured Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncoated paper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It isn't just black that creates problems, any dark colored printing paper presents challenges. The biggest hurdle is that printing inks are transparent. CYMK (Cyan, Yellow, Magenta, and Black) dots are meant to be seen through. Overlapping dots create the color variations, you know, blue + yellow = green or yellow + red = orange.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><p>It isn&#8217;t just black that creates a problem, any dark colored printing paper presents challenges. The biggest hurdle is that printing inks are transparent. CYMK (Cyan, Yellow, Magenta, and Black) dots are meant to be seen through. Overlapping dots create the color variations, you know, blue + yellow = green or yellow + red = orange. So what happens when you print transparent ink on dark paper? Right, the stock overwhelms the ink  and you either don&#8217;t see it or the image is so faint as to be useless.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why do the mills create printing papers that won&#8217;t work well on press?&#8221; you might ask. Ah, that is a good question. Those wily paper mills know what Graphic Designers want and bold colored paper is often the best choice for their project. Strong color adds drama that you just can&#8217;t get with pastel shades. Again, &#8220;Why use it if it won&#8217;t yield a good result?&#8221; Printers have more than one trick up their sleeves. There are other processes that can be employed to print on dark paper.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Reverse Image:</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_737" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 219px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-737" title="final_reverse_image" src="http://www.billprintbroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/final_reverse_image-209x300.jpg" alt="Reverse image and type" width="209" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Reverse image and type</p></div>
<p>The simplest way to achieve a dark background with a light image is to print it. Print the background with solid black, plum, or forest green on a white stock. Leave a window for the images, and you can achieve almost any look you want. The difficulty here is that offset printing is done with dots, as we discussed in an earlier blog. Print the dots on a textured or soft paper surface and you&#8217;ll probably end up with streaky, or splotchy solids. The paper surface makes a big difference. Make sure you discuss these issues with your printing professional before you go to press. Streaky, splotchy surprises are not fun.</p>
<p>The  poster to the right for the <em>Rhythm City Dance School is </em> a good example of reversed images. The type is white, but the dancer is gray. White is the color of the stock and the gray was achieved by using a screen of black (separating the black dots).  The point is, that while this piece appears to be printed on black paper it is really printed on white paper with a lot of black ink.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Foil Stamp:</strong></span></p>
<p>Most foils are made opaque on purpose. They will cover any background color. The problem is that foil stamping is more costly than offset printing because it requires a die, the foil, and equipment that runs slower. The good news is that foil is available in a wide spectrum of colors, and finishes. For example you can get gold foil in satin, flat, shiny, and really shiny. It also comes in many shades. Gold foils are available in yellowish tints, greenish tints, and nearly bronze. Other foils that work well are white, silver, or clear.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Blind Emboss:</strong></span></p>
<p>An excellent treatment to employ using dark paper is the blind emboss. Blind embossing raises the surface of the paper creating an image that is perceived by its height. It&#8217;s like a white-on-white blouse. The color is the same, but the pattern is revealed anyway. Blind embossing will cost more also than offset printing. Dies can get very pricey depending on the number of levels in your image. Most blind embosses are one level, but I&#8217;ve seen sculptured dies with a face or animal that are very complex. Sculptured dies, as you might imagine, can get into the thousands of dollars.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Foil Emboss:</strong></span></p>
<p>As you might expect foil embossing uses both techniques. The image is foil stamped and then raised via blind emboss. A combo die can be created for this effect. Combo dies, as you probably guessed, cost less than buying two separate dies.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Opaque Inks:</strong></span></p>
<p>Most opaque inks are not as opaque as you would like them to be. Imagine painting a light color over a previously dark wall. If you&#8217;ve had this experience you know that one coat won&#8217;t be enough. You might have to do two, three, or four coats before the wall is right. It&#8217;s the same with opaque inks. To blot out a dark surface the printer may have to double-bump (hit the image twice with the same color) and that probably won&#8217;t be enough. Additional bumps should work, theoretically,  but with each pass through the press you risk slurring your image or ruining paper. Paper is not indestructible, you know.</p>
<p>Metallic inks usually work better for this purpose. Metallic inks are made with up to 70% heavy metals, but even with metallic ink you will probably have to double-bump the image. And, this technique is not recommended for large areas.Type works better than swaths  of color which may show up blotchy.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Black-on-Black:</strong></span></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen some excellent results with combinations of  black. For example, black paper on the market is almost always uncoated, which means that the color is a little flatter. If you use a black foil stamp or clear foil you can create a striking look by contrasting the paper surface with the shiny image.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Spot UV Coating:</strong></span></p>
<p>It used to be that UV coating on uncoated paper was a no,no. There are new formulas that will allow spot UV, but aren&#8217;t guaranteed. Much depends on the paper you select. If you want to try spot UV coating, be sure to get samples from your local paper merchant, and have the printer test it.</p>
<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/03/printing-on-black-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Respect the Proof</title>
		<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/03/respect-the-proof/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/03/respect-the-proof/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Choosing a printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Four Color Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMS Inks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print Brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technological Advances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncoated paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blueline proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chromalins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[color-key proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CYMK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct-to-plate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[folding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fountain solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ink dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low-res Proofs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matchprints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing plates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofing responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ripping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spot Color]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proofs are your chance, often your last chance, to make sure everything is right before printing. I often hear customers say they don't need a proof, or they don't want a press check. That, in my opinion, is a big mistake. More than once I've seen jobs get  all the way to the press before the customer notices a critical error like a wrong phone number, or address.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><p>What do you look for on a proof? That seems like an easy question and it used to be a little easier to answer than it is now. The first thing you need to understand is that your signature on the proof releases the printer, or the broker, from all responsibility for the printed piece. By that I mean, if the product is a close match to the proof, but you don&#8217;t like it after all, or you found an error, the problem is yours.  Don&#8217;t blame the printers even if they were the ones who introduced the mistake. Proofs are your chance, often your last chance, to make sure everything is right before printing. I often hear customers say they don&#8217;t need a proof, or they don&#8217;t want a press check. That, in my opinion, is a big mistake. More than once I&#8217;ve seen jobs get  all the way to the press before the customer notices a critical error like a wrong phone number, or address.</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #cd853f;">wrong + wrong = right</span></h5>
<p>Printing, in general, is an imperfect process. I&#8217;ve written about this before, but it bears repeating, you start with the premise that oil (ink) and water (fountain solution) don&#8217;t mix and proceed to make it work. It&#8217;s a case of two wrongs making a right.</p>
<p>Back to the question of checking a proof. What you look for depends on the kind of proof you received. Most printers are now using direct-to-plate technology. Direct-to-plate has revolutionized the plate making process. A print shop of not too many years past used to have large rooms with big light tables throughout. The light tables were used to strip the film. Now the tables are gone and the rooms are empty, leaving lots of space for an arcade, or shuffleboard. I&#8217;m kidding, but what do they do with the extra space? Maybe shuffleboard isn&#8217;t a bad idea. In the era of the light table and hand stripping proofs they were  either bluelines (for one color printing), or color-keys (for four color printing). You aren&#8217;t likely to come across these terms anymore, but you might, so I&#8217;m telling you about them. There were other kinds of proofs too like Matchprints, or Chromalins. No matter what kind of proof was presented to the customer there was always one flaw&#8211;the color proofs were good for four color process, but if you used a PMS color from the Pantone book, you had to guess at the result. Kind of like looking at a small  paint chip vs. painting a large wall. Most printers will provide a digital hard-copy proof.</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #cd853f;">What do I look for?</span></h5>
<p>Generally you want to check a hard-copy proof for:</p>
<ul>
<li>Color. Does it look like the color you expected to get? Remember though, the color that appears on your computer monitor might not be the actual color. Ripped (separating the colors into dots) color is different. Your monitor&#8217;s pixels are RGB (red, green,blue) and ripped color is CYMK (cyan, yellow,magenta, black). If the color is way off, you might have to go back and fix some things or have the printer help you fix it. If the color is close, don&#8217;t make yourself crazy, let it pass.</li>
<li>Size. If your image was supposed to be 8 1/2&#8243;X11&#8243; and it comes out as 4&#8243;X6&#8243; there is a problem.</li>
<li>Type. Because computer design is done in layers, it is very easy to cover a portion of your type block with a window. You may not see it on your screen, so you need to watch for it on the proof.</li>
<li>Reflow. This is becoming less of a problem than it used to be, but you should still watch for it. Reflow usually happens when the font you are using doesn&#8217;t match the font in the printer&#8217;s system. If you haven&#8217;t downloaded your fonts they will default to the printer&#8217;s defaults. Small sizing or kerning (the space between letters) can throw your document off. Particularly if you are using a PC and the printer is on Mac.</li>
<li>Missing or Added elements. I think this one is self-explanatory.</li>
<li>Bleeds. If you want your piece to bleed (ink goes to the edge of the sheet) did you allow a 1/8&#8243; overhang beyond the trims?</li>
<li>Back up. Does the front back up correctly with the back? You might need a second low-res proof to see this, but unless back up isn&#8217;t important, be sure you get a folded proof.</li>
</ul>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #cd853f;">wait til the press check</span></h5>
<p>What to ignore or save for the press check.</p>
<ul>
<li>PMS or Spot color. Ripped proofs are still using four color process dots to create approximate color. It can be way off. If you are concerned about the spot color, do yourself a favor and attend a press check.</li>
<li>Small dots. The computer picks up very small dots and reproduces them on the digital proof. A 1% to 3% dot may not appear on the plate. If those dots are important to the design be aware that they could disappear. If the dots are fighting your design the same is true. To be sure, go to a press check.</li>
<li>Paper. The proof you see will be different when ink touches paper, particularly if it is an uncoated sheet. All proofs are approximations. To know for sure you have to see the ink on paper.</li>
</ul>
<p>Respect the proof. That might sound funny, but if you attempt to glance at the proof and give it a cursory approval, you are bound to have mistakes. Stop, take a deep breath, and concentrate on the proof. You&#8217;ll have fewer errors. And maybe, fewer times called on the carpet.</p>
<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/03/respect-the-proof/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murphy was a Printer</title>
		<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/03/murphy-was-a-printer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/03/murphy-was-a-printer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Four Color Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outmoded printing methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Brochures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bid specifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bindery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boogie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CYMK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphic designers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ink dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscommunication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murphy's Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prepress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing plates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stat-camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strippers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask any printer you know or any that you don't know for that matter if Murphy was a printer and you'll hear a resounding, "Yes" or maybe an emphatic, "Hell, Yes." For those readers who may not know Murphy's Law, it goes like this, "Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong." What does that mean? I'll tell you, it means that no matter how perfectly you plan a print job, and how thoroughly you execute that plan, in the end there's a chance that a boogie will jump out and ruin the whole darn thing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><p>The last few blogs I&#8217;ve posted have been stressing the importance giving the printer correct specifications so that your returning bids will be accurate. If you do that, and do it perfectly, will that prevent errors? No. Ask any printer you know or any that you don&#8217;t know for that matter if Murphy was a printer and you&#8217;ll hear a resounding, &#8220;Yes&#8221; or maybe an emphatic, &#8220;Hell, Yes.&#8221; For those readers who may not know <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Murphy&#8217;s Law</span>, it goes like this, &#8220;Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong.&#8221; What does that mean? I&#8217;ll tell you, it means that no matter how perfectly you plan a print job, and how thoroughly you execute that plan, in the end there&#8217;s a chance that a boogie will jump out and ruin the whole darn thing.</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #cd853f;">So many steps, no wonder someone trips</span><span style="color: #cd853f;">.</span></h5>
<p>Why does Murphy pick on printers? That&#8217;s a good question that I think can be answered very simply by the complexity, and number of steps it takes to get something printed. For example I once worked on a company&#8217;s brochure. They, the company, hired a graphic designer who hired a photographer to take shots of the workplace. The pictures were professionally done, and the graphic designer did an excellent job in preparing the art. This was before computer design programs when art was furnished to the printer on art boards, so the first step in the process was to shoot the art on our stat camera, and send the photos out to be drum scanned. State of the art stuff for the day. When the prepress people, who were called in the industry (don&#8217;t laugh) strippers, got the camera&#8217;s film and the film from the separator they had to strip it all together.  This required a different set of negatives for each color. Which were carefully taken over to a plate burner where the negatives were placed precisely over a printing plate and the images photographically etched onto the plate. Then the plate had to be developed. I could go on and on, but I&#8217;ve probably already put you to sleep so I&#8217;ll stop here.</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #cd853f;">miscommunications happen</span></h5>
<p>Did you count the steps it took just to get a plate made, and the number of places where something could go wrong? The first possible communication error was between the customer and the graphic designer, the second between the photographer and the designer, and the third between me (the sales rep) and the designer. Another possible point of error is between the printer&#8217;s sales person and the estimator. Do you see where I&#8217;m going with this? If the job is miscommunicated up front, in any way, there isn&#8217;t anything you can do in the production to make it right. I often hear customers say, I don&#8217;t need a proof, just go on with the job. I understand, they are busy and don&#8217;t need any more to-do&#8217;s in their day, but proofs, and specs, and everything else we do to communicate the job are as necessary to the job performance as getting the art in the first place.</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #cd853f;">Ruined because of what?</span></h5>
<p>Back to the brochure, after all those steps and I didn&#8217;t even enumerate what could go wrong on press, in the bindery, or even with delivery, after the job was delivered I got a phone call from the president of the company. He said, &#8220;This is a terrible brochure. You ruined what was supposed to be a showpiece for our company.&#8221;</p>
<p>I had samples on my desk and for the life of me couldn&#8217;t understand why he would be so upset. It was a beautiful piece. So I asked, &#8220;What exactly is the problem?&#8221;</p>
<p>He told me that his secretary&#8217;s dress came out too aqua it was really more of a royal blue color. I swear this is a true story! Her dress was the wrong shade of blue, are you kidding me? Assuming there was a real problem, where could it have taken a wrong turn? First if shot under fluorescent lights unless they are color corrected everything will be tinged with yellow. The color separator could have been adjusting for pleasing flesh tones and tweaked it a little off color. Printing is done with dots as I mentioned in an earlier blog (<small>Sunday, February 15th, 2009)</small>, those dots are made with four pigments, CYMK. Not every color can be perfectly reproduced with those colors. Finally on press, the ink flow to the sheet is adjusted by the press operator to get the best result. Where did it go wrong-anywhere, nowhere.  The real question was did the brochure fulfill it&#8217;s purpose? Was it professionally produced in an accepted workmanlike manner? Yes and yes. Did any potential customer refuse to buy his product because of the color of the secretary&#8217;s dress? I don&#8217;t think so. His reaction was a bit over the top don&#8217;t you think? I wonder what was really going on?</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #cd853f;">He was</span></h5>
<p>But again, Murphy was a printer. I swear that he was.</p>
<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/03/murphy-was-a-printer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Coat or Not to Coat</title>
		<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/02/to-coat-or-not-to-coat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/02/to-coat-or-not-to-coat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gloss coated paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncoated paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coated paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designer wannabe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gloss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphic designers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ink dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper merchant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper swatch books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So out of gloss, dull, matte, and uncoated which paper is best? The answer is it depends. The best paper is the paper that fits your project.  It seems like that should be a no-brainer, but believe me it is not. Graphic designers usually have bookshelves full of paper swatches to play with, to aid them in deciding what stock to specify. Choosing the right paper can make the difference between a successful result and one that just doesn't make it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #996633;">wax paper vs paper towel experiment</span></h5>
<p>Another 60 second soap box lecture I like to use in teaching customers is the one about coated paper vs uncoated paper. Visualize yourself going into the kitchen and tearing off a sheet of paper towel. Lay the sheet on the counter. Now, do the same thing with a sheet of wax paper. Take a singe drop of liquid and release it on the paper towel. Do the same with the wax paper. What do you notice? The drop on the towel spreads and penetrates. The drop on the wax paper beads and stays on the surface.</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #996633;">paper surface</span></h5>
<p>&#8220;And what does that have to do with printing?&#8221; you might ask. The above example is a dramatic representation of what happens with ink on paper. The softer the sheet the larger the ink dot gets. A hard surface keeps the ink on top. So? What does that mean? Think of a newspaper, or better yet go get a newspaper. Find a color picture of a person, usually on the front page. Now, get a shiny magazine. Compare the image on newsprint with the image out of the magazine. What are the differences? It won&#8217;t take you long to discover that the colors are more brilliant on the magazine and the images are sharper.</p>
<p>Does that mean that magazine printing is superior? No, not at all. There are many times that a graphic designer may want to choose an uncoated paper.  The purpose of the piece might be better served with a softer look. Pastels usually work better on uncoated paper. If there is something the customer needs to write on like an RSVP or order form, uncoated paper accepts pen, pencil, crayon or any other writing implement. Coated paper doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #996633;">gloss, dull, and matte</span></h5>
<p>I&#8217;m tempted, at this point, to walk you through the paper making process so we can discuss the differences between the three most common paper coatings  gloss, dull,  and matte, but I think I&#8217;ll hold off on that. What I will talk about is how these three coatings accept ink dots. You understand by now that the harder the paper surface the more the dot stays on top and the less it penetrates into the sheet, right? Which of the three, gloss, dull, or matte would you imagine has the harder surface? If you said gloss, you are right. Dull is next, followed by matte. I&#8217;ve had customers confuse matte with uncoated paper because matte looks similar to uncoated. While the ink dot penetrates the fibers more on a matte than a gloss, it doesn&#8217;t penetrate a matte like it does on uncoated. So, if you want a softer look, but want to still get some pizazz out of the ink, try matte. If matte is good but lacks a little crispness, go to dull coat. If your image screams for brighter deeper color, by all means specify gloss.</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #996633;">deciding which is best</span></h5>
<p>So out of gloss, dull, matte, and uncoated which paper is best? The answer is it depends. The best paper is the paper that fits your project.  It seems like that should be a no-brainer, but believe me it is not. Graphic designers usually have bookshelves full of paper swatches to play with, to aid them in deciding what stock to specify. Choosing the right paper can make the difference between a successful result and one that just doesn&#8217;t make it. If you don&#8217;t have a bookshelf full of swatches and you are a designer, or a designer wannabe, call your local paper merchant and ask to meet with their paper specifier. They can guide you and usually provide you with more samples than you will ever need to use. You can also rely on your printer for help, or if you are lucky enough to get me, you will have one of the best in the biz, I say with all humility.</p>
<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/02/to-coat-or-not-to-coat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Printing Dots and CYMK</title>
		<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/02/336/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/02/336/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Four Color Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CYMK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full-color]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ink dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pantone Matching System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printers loop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Cyan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Magenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Yellow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soap-box sermon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sqare dots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stochstic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Printing is done with round dots. Some will argue with me about this because there are square dots called Stochastic, and elliptical dots, but let's keep it simple for the time being--shall we? The smaller and closer the dots are together the more intense the color.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><p>Over the years I&#8217;ve developed a few soapbox sermons I use to teach my customers about the printing process. One of the easiest to visualize is the one about ink dots. I&#8217;ve taught this to small audiences and larger ones.</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #996633;">Lots of Dots<br />
</span></h5>
<p>Printing is done with round dots. Some will argue with me about this because there are square dots called Stochastic, and elliptical dots, but let&#8217;s keep it simple for the time being&#8211;shall we? The smaller and closer the dots are together the more intense the color. For example let&#8217;s say you are using a black dot. When the dots are all shoved together you have solid black, but if you separate the dots using a screen you&#8217;ll get various shades of gray.</p>
<h6>Copyright © 2000-2009 Dreamstime. All rights reserved.</h6>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-339" title="raster-spiral-thumb7349382" src="http://www.billprintbroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/raster-spiral-thumb7349382.jpg" alt="raster-spiral-thumb7349382" width="300" height="300" /><br />
The spiral image here clearly shows the point I&#8217;m trying to make. In printing we use four colors, sometimes called full color, or four color process. These four colors Process Cyan, Process Yellow, Process Magenta, and Black (CYMK) combine to make just about every color you can imagine. Why do I say process before each of the colors? It is because <em>process</em> inks are a little different than PMS (Pantone Matching System) inks. Process is this case is not a verb, it doesn&#8217;t mean the procedure. Process as printer&#8217;s use the term is a noun.</p>
<p>Like I said earlier, the smaller the dot and the closer they come to one another, the stronger color. Look at the Dreamstime illustration again. On the upper part of the pink, you&#8217;ll notice that the dots get so small, and so close together, that you have a difficult time distinguishing them.The same is true with the solid blacks.</p>
<h5 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #996633;">Under Flawless Skin</span></h5>
<p>One thing I like to show my customers who are unfamiliar with printing dots is to take a magazine, any magazine, place my printer&#8217;s loupe (a magnifier) on a color photo and let them see the printed dots. It&#8217;s always surprises them to see that a flawless model&#8217;s skin is constructed from tiny dots.</p>
<p>The same is true of a picture of a mountain reflected in a pristine lake, or a red tricyle in the rain, or the blue-ribbon winning pig at the fair. It&#8217;s all dots. Dots, dots, dots, and more dots. When first exposed to this, most people are a little taken aback. It somehow seems a little magical, and that is just one of the reasons that printing is a miracle.</p>
<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2009/02/336/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

