<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talking Through My Hat &#187; Bill Clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billprintbroker.com/tag/bill-clinton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com</link>
	<description>Printing, Publishing, and Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:45:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wanna Know Who Caused Printers So Much Hurt?</title>
		<link>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2010/04/wanna-know-who-caused-printers-so-much-hurt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2010/04/wanna-know-who-caused-printers-so-much-hurt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banks & Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Frustrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxpayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blindly Following]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogeyman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downsizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elected officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDR era]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sacs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing Bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPMorgan Chase & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loopholes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nest Egg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ploy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Printing News Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Realtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-size Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roosevelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.E.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talking Throug My Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells Fargo & Co.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billprintbroker.com/?p=2675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone knows that the printing business is changing, but it took Wall Street in collusion with our government to make it catastrophic. We could have transitioned into the new market realities much more smoothly if the economy hadn't gone to hell in a hand basket. How did it happen?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><h5><span style="color: #808080;">by Bill Ruesch</span></h5>
<h2><span style="color: #000033;"><em><strong>READ ON</strong></em></span></h2>
<p><span style="color: #000033;"><em>The tag line to <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Talking Through My Hat</span> is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Printing, Publishing, and Observations.</span> This particular post falls more in the category of Observations&#8211;or does it? We all know that the printing industry is changing, but did the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>changes </strong></span>have to be so<span style="color: #330066;"> <strong>catastrophic</strong></span>? <a href="http://www.printingnews.com/publication/index.jsp?pubId=3" title="Printing News Magazine" >Printing News Magazine</a> recently posted an article on downsizing that contained these words in the first paragraph, <span style="color: #330066;">&#8220;</span></em></span><em><span style="color: #000033;"><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">The latest financial crisis seems to have affected our industry like no  previous recession. Record numbers of printers have closed  or consolidated. Staff, salary and work hour reductions have become  common themes.&#8221;</span> </span>To read more see, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.linkedin.com/news?viewArticle=&amp;articleID=125286752&amp;gid=1838649&amp;articleURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.printingnews.com%2Fprint%2FPrinting-News%2FImplementing-a-Right-sizing-Plan%2F3%2412323&amp;urlhash=is_D&amp;trk=news_discuss" title="Printing News--Implementing a Right-Size Plan"  target="_blank">Implementing a Right-size Plan</a>. It is a good article.</span></em></p>
<h2><em><span style="color: #000033;">WILL THE REAL BOGEYMAN PLEASE STAND UP?<br />
</span></em></h2>
<p><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Goldman Sachs</strong></span> </span>is in trouble with the <strong><span style="color: #330066;">S.E.C.</span><em><span style="color: #4c004c;"> </span></em></strong>It&#8217;s all over the news. Whether they are guilty of the charges against them I don&#8217;t really know, but I&#8217;m concerned that they are being singled out to<span style="color: #330066;"><strong> take one for the team</strong></span>. You see, <span style="color: #4c004c;"><span style="color: #330066;"><strong>diversion</strong></span><em><strong> </strong></em></span>is a common <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>ploy</strong></span> used by government to<strong><span style="color: #330066;"> pacify the</span><span style="color: #4c004c;"><span style="color: #330066;"> populace</span>.</span></strong> If they can hold up one bad apple and convince us that the problem will be solved by the censure, restriction, or removal of the perceived enemy all will be made right. Our<strong><span style="color: #4c004c;"> <span style="color: #330066;">anger</span></span><span style="color: #330066;"> will dissipate </span></strong>and we the people will continue <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>blindly following and believing</strong></span> our leaders who are, after all, just sincerely protecting our interests.</p>
<h2><em><span style="color: #000033;"><strong>DON&#8217;T BELIEVE IT!</strong></span></em></h2>
<p>The<span style="color: #330099;"><strong> <span style="color: #330066;">anger of the American people</span></strong></span> that arose from the financial collapse and bailout is <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>justified</strong></span>. If they try to convince us that it was just because <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Goldman Sachs went renegade</strong></span>&#8211;don&#8217;t believe it.<span style="color: #330099;"><strong> <span style="color: #330066;">The problem is much bigger </span></strong></span>than one company. The problem was created by the <strong><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">congress in collusion</span> </span></strong>with the financial industry.</p>
<p>I was one who was once convinced that the <strong>Free Market</strong> would make everything right. Doesn’t the idea of a<strong><span style="color: #330099;"> <span style="color: #330066;">free market</span> </span></strong>make sense? After all, free people make choices based on what they want and how much they are willing to pay. Industries either find ways to provide the goods and services desired by the consumers or they go out of business. That&#8217;s <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>free enterprise</strong></span>, and who could possibly be against free enterprise?</p>
<h2><em><span style="color: #000033;"><strong>WRONG!</strong></span></em></h2>
<p>For most of my life I&#8217;ve been wrapped up in a warm pink bubble secure in the belief that the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Constitution guides</strong></span> our government and <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>protects our interests</strong>-</span>-wrong! Our elected officials have become <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>masters of illusion</strong>.</span> They pledge their hearts, minds, and souls to serving the people and upholding the Constitution and then they and their lobbyist buddies huddle in secret places to find, or <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>create loopholes</strong></span>.</p>
<p>I was convinced that <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>FDR was a socialist</strong> </span>and that his policies were the<strong><span style="color: #330066;"> real </span><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">threat</span> </span></strong>to the American way of life, but Roosevelt put<span style="color: #330066;"><strong> restrictions on the banks</strong></span> that kept them from pulling the shenanigans that led to this deepest <strong><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">recession</span> </span></strong>since the<strong><span style="color: #330099;"> <span style="color: #330066;">Great Depression</span></span></strong> and nearly toppled the financial systems of the entire world.</p>
<h2><em><span style="color: #000033;"><strong>WHAT HAPPENED?</strong></span></em></h2>
<p><span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Deregulation</strong></span> is what happened. Deregulation was proposed by<span style="color: #330099;"><strong> <span style="color: #330066;">Ronald Reagan</span></strong></span> during his administration. Again, <strong><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">it seemed like a good idea</span> </span></strong>at the time. Then came the Savings and Loan collapses. We slowed deregulation for a time, but over the years culminating with <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Bill Clinton</strong></span>, one-by-one all of the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>FDR restrictions </strong></span>were removed. Did deregulation make life better for consumers? At first it did&#8211;maybe. Then chaos reigned. <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Without rules</strong></span> the financial industry went wild. They started offering mortgage loans to people who didn&#8217;t have to prove they had the ability to repay those loans. Who thought <em>that </em>was a good idea?</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">Goldman Sacs executives</span> </span></strong>were, and apparently still are, at the top of the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>gravy chain</strong></span>. By some miracle they finally got caught by the<strong><span style="color: #330066;"> S.E.C</span></strong>. Like the SEC didn&#8217;t know what they were up to long before this&#8211;right? They along with other <strong><span style="color: #330066;">bazillion dollar a year execs</span><span style="color: #330099;"> </span></strong>plotted to sell<strong><span style="color: #330066;"> derivatives</span></strong> and created other financial vehicles to muddy the waters and  <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>obscure the big secret </strong></span>that the nest egg had already been <strong><span style="color: #330066;">sucked dry. </span></strong><span style="color: #000000;"> In reality there wasn&#8217;t a nest egg at all! A good-faith contract  knowingly offered to a party that does not have the means </span>to meet the  terms of the agreement is<span style="color: #330066;"> <strong>not an asset</strong></span>&#8211;duh.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #000033;"><em><strong>GOVERNMENT TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER</strong></em></span></h2>
<p>The <strong><span style="color: #330066;">banking interests</span></strong> have been <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>funding lobbying</strong></span> like they never have before. The <a rel="nofollow" href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/feb/16/business/la-fi-bank-lobbying16-2010feb16" title="LA Times --Bank Lobbying"  target="_blank">LA Times</a> had this to say about lobbying expense,&#8221;<span style="color: #000033;"><em>The biggest spender was <strong><span style="color: #330066;">JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</span></strong>, whose lobbying  budget <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>rose 12%</strong></span> to $6.2 million, enough for the firm to have <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>more than  30 lobbyists</strong> </span>working for it. Among <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>other banks</strong></span>, spending on lobbying  rose <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>27% at Wells Fargo &amp; Co.</strong></span> and<span style="color: #330066;"> <strong>16% at Morgan Stanley.</strong></span></em></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000033;"><em>&#8220;I  have never seen such a<span style="color: #330099;"><strong> <span style="color: #330066;">scrum of bank lobbyists</span></strong></span><span style="color: #330066;"> </span>as I have in the last  year &#8212; and I&#8217;ve worked on quite a few bank issues over the years,&#8221; said  Ed Mierzwinski, a lobbyist for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group,  a coalition of state consumer organizations. It seems like everybody  is out of work except for bank lobbyists.&#8221;</em></span></p>
<h2><span style="color: #000033;"><em><strong>SURPRISE, SURPRISE!</strong></em></span></h2>
<p>In retrospect, is it any wonder that this foolish behavior would lead to<strong><span style="color: #330099;"> collapse</span></strong>? We were told two years before it happened that there was a housing bubble, but even our personal Realtor was convinced that prices were going to continue to escalate. For awhile he seemed to be right. The home we bought for just over 300 thousand, climbed to 500 thousand+ over the next two years. Lucky for us we bought low and with a mortgage payment we could afford, so we haven&#8217;t been in danger of foreclosure.  What is our house worth now? Closer to what we paid for it originally. At least we aren&#8217;t upside down. Thank goodness for that.</p>
<p>We have survived, so far, the <strong><span style="color: #330099;"><span style="color: #330066;">housing bubble</span>.</span></strong> What we are fighting everyday, however, is the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>aftershocks of the recession</strong></span>. All the banks are<span style="color: #330066;"> <strong>raising interest rates</strong></span> so <em>they </em>can recover, at our expense, the losses sustained from <em>their </em>bad decisions. People have had to cut back on purchases they would have normally made. Because of belt tightening by consumers, business saw decreases in sales and governments local, state, and federal saw resulting decreases in taxes so governments have been trying to recoup their losses by raising rates, fees, and taxes where ever they can.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #000033;"><em><strong>WHEN WE CAN LEAST AFFORD IT</strong></em></span></h2>
<p>When we can least afford it, the <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>poor </strong></span><span style="color: #330099;"><strong><span style="color: #330066;">taxpayer/consumer</span> </strong></span>is being <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>squeezed for every dime</strong></span>. Does <span style="color: #330066;"><strong>Goldman Sacs </strong></span>deserve to be on the <strong><span style="color: #330066;">chopping block</span></strong>? I&#8217;m pretty sure that they do, but they aren&#8217;t the only ones. The system needs a huge overhaul and needs it now starting with reintroducing all of the FDR era banking restrictions.</p>
<p>For more of my thoughts go to: <a href="http://wp.me/pqeFo-qV%20"  target="_new">http://wp.me/pqeFo-qV</a> and <a href="http://wp.me/pqeFo-v5"  target="_new">http://wp.me/pqeFo-v5</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.billprintbroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/png-e1264380684958." ><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2293" title="Bills Hat" src="http://www.billprintbroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/png-e1264380684958." alt="" width="40" height="25" /></a><form method="post" action=""><input type="hidden" name="ip" value="38.107.179.221" /><p><label for="s2email">Your email:</label><br /><input type="text" name="email" id="s2email" value="Enter email address..." size="20" onfocus="if (this.value == 'Enter email address...') {this.value = '';}" onblur="if (this.value == '') {this.value = 'Enter email address...';}" /></p><p><input type="submit" name="subscribe" value="Subscribe" />&nbsp;<input type="submit" name="unsubscribe" value="Unsubscribe" /></p></form>

<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.billprintbroker.com/2010/04/wanna-know-who-caused-printers-so-much-hurt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

